Author
Abstract
The current study investigates how two groups of mathematically gifted pupils with learning difficulties (MG/LD) change/do not change their attitudes towards, and beliefs about, mathematics over five weeks during which they received two different instructional programs in mathematics. Thirty pupils (16 girls and 14 boys), aged 10 years to 11 years and 11 months, were identified as ‘mathematically gifted children with learning difficulties’ at three public primary schools in Amman, Jordan. Pupils were divided equally into two treatment groups: the first group (n = 15) received traditional mathematics instruction, while the second group (n = 15) received multi-sensory/enrichment mathematics instruction. The pupils in the two groups were matched according to the following criteria: school, grade, gender, IQ scores, mathematical abilities, levels of learning difficulty, and access to teaching resources. The Pupil Questionnaire of the Mathematics Attitude Scale for gifted and non-gifted children (Jarwan, 2001) was administered prior to and after instruction. The findings revealed that while positive changes occurred in the students' self-concept in mathematics in the multi-sensory/enrichment group, students' self-concept in the traditional group declined. Positive effects were noted from multi-sensory/enrichment treatment on students' beliefs about themselves in relation to mathematics; but negative effects resulting from traditional instruction. Exposure to a novel instruction, compared to traditional instruction, enabled pupils to enjoy mathematics and attribute their success to their own efforts rather than luck.
Suggested Citation
Anies Al-Hroub, 2009.
"Charting Self-Concept, Beliefs and Attitudes towards Mathematics among Mathematically Gifted Pupils with Learning Difficulties,"
Gifted and Talented International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 93-106, March.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:24:y:2009:i:1:p:93-106
DOI: 10.1080/15332276.2009.11674864
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:24:y:2009:i:1:p:93-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ugti .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.