IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ugtixx/v24y2009i1p25-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multilevel Analysis of Gifted Korean American Students' Characteristics and School Context Effects on Learning Style Preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Mi-Soon Lee
  • Del Siegle

Abstract

This study examined school factors related to the learning style preferences of gifted Korean American students. The Learning Styles Inventory-Ill (LSI, Renzulli, Rizza, & Smith, 2002) and the Ethnic Orientation Scale (EOS) were administered to 407 Korean American students in 30 schools. A Hierarchical Linear Model (HLM) with student and school-level variables indicated differences in learning style preferences between gifted Korean American and non-gifted Korean American students on preferences for direct instruction, technology, simulations, projects, and games. School context mediated these learning style differences between students' giftedness and learning styles. Learning is based on students' experiences, culture, gender, genetic codes, and neurological wiring (Tomlinson, 1999). Students may have preferred ways of taking in, processing, internalizing, and retaining information and skills. These are typically referred to as students' learning styles (Dunn & Milgram, 1993). Students' learning styles can dictate how they approach and process tasks. Understanding how students learn is important in planning instructions to assist them to achieve their fullest potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Mi-Soon Lee & Del Siegle, 2009. "A Multilevel Analysis of Gifted Korean American Students' Characteristics and School Context Effects on Learning Style Preferences," Gifted and Talented International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 25-38, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:24:y:2009:i:1:p:25-38
    DOI: 10.1080/15332276.2009.11674858
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15332276.2009.11674858
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15332276.2009.11674858?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:24:y:2009:i:1:p:25-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ugti .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.