IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ugtixx/v20y2005i2p7-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motivational Orientations and Cognitive Abilities: An Empirical Investigation in Primary School

Author

Listed:
  • Heidrun Stoeger
  • Albert Ziegler

Abstract

In an empirical investigation with fourth grade students, the correlation between motivational orientation and cognitive abilities was placed under examination. Outcome variables were performance, confidence in one’s own abilities and anxiety. Cognitive abilities and learning goal orientation both correlated positively with favorable expressions of the outcome variables. Performance goals, however, proved to be maladaptive in our study. From a theoretical perspective we find two points to be of basic importance: first, although almost all conceptions of giftedness accord high motivation levels a great deal of importance for achievement excellence, motivation itself is conceived in rather simplistic terms. Our study confirmed that high motivation can also be detrimental and that the exact form of motivation is consequential. Second, it could be demonstrated that motivation and cognitive abilities interact. This implies that findings made in motivation research cannot be simply transferred to the gifted. From a pedagogic perspective, a learning goal orientation seems worth encouraging, while, in contrast to opinions often expressed in the literature, a goal orientation approach seems to be affiliated with hazards for the learning processes of gifted individuals.

Suggested Citation

  • Heidrun Stoeger & Albert Ziegler, 2005. "Motivational Orientations and Cognitive Abilities: An Empirical Investigation in Primary School," Gifted and Talented International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 7-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:20:y:2005:i:2:p:7-18
    DOI: 10.1080/15332276.2005.11673449
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15332276.2005.11673449
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15332276.2005.11673449?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:20:y:2005:i:2:p:7-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ugti .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.