IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ugitxx/v7y2004i4p47-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural Universality Versus Particularity in CMC

Author

Listed:
  • Bernd Carsten Stahl
  • Ibrahim Elbeltagi

Abstract

Cultural factors are often identified as a crucial influence on the success or failure of information systems in general and computer-mediated communication (CMC) in particular. Several authors have suggested ways in which management can accommodate these factors or solve the problem they pose. This paper attempts to go one step beyond management measures and ask whether there is a theoretical foundation on which one can base the mutual influence of culture and CMC. In order to find such a theoretical basis the paper discusses the question whether there are aspects of culture that are universal or whether culture is always particular. In the course of this discussion the concept of culture is defined and its relationship with technology is analysed. As a solution the paper suggests a Habermasian approach to culture which sees a universal background to particular cultures in the structure of communication which creates and sustains culture. The paper then tries to give an outlook how such a Habermasian theory of culture can enable designers and users of CMC to reflect on their activity and improve the quality and reach of CMC.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernd Carsten Stahl & Ibrahim Elbeltagi, 2004. "Cultural Universality Versus Particularity in CMC," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(4), pages 47-65, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ugitxx:v:7:y:2004:i:4:p:47-65
    DOI: 10.1080/1097198X.2004.10856384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1097198X.2004.10856384
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1097198X.2004.10856384?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ugitxx:v:7:y:2004:i:4:p:47-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ugit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.