IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v77y2021i2p43-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Mitigation of Corporate Social Performance in US Class Action Lawsuits

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel V. Fauser
  • Sebastian Utz

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and litigation risk by examining US class action lawsuits. We found that a 1 standard deviation improvement in the ESG controversies of an average company in the sample reduced litigation risk from 3.1% to 2.4%. Moreover, an average company with low ESG performance exhibited a loss in market value twice as large as that of a company with high ESG performance—an abnormal loss of US$1.14 billion. Implementation of our findings with a trading strategy yielded positive monthly alphas, suggesting that investors benefit from lower litigation risk and the insurance-like protection of high ESG performance.Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Editor’s note: Submitted 24 April 2020Accepted 1 December 2020 by Stephen J. Brown.This article was externally reviewed using our double-blind peer-review process. When the article was accepted for publication, the authors thanked the reviewers in their acknowledgments. Jie Cao and one anonymous reviewer were the reviewers for this article.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel V. Fauser & Sebastian Utz, 2021. "Risk Mitigation of Corporate Social Performance in US Class Action Lawsuits," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(2), pages 43-65, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:77:y:2021:i:2:p:43-65
    DOI: 10.1080/0015198X.2020.1861896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0015198X.2020.1861896
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0015198X.2020.1861896?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:77:y:2021:i:2:p:43-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.