IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v76y2020i3p99-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Evaluation of Tax-Loss-Harvesting Alpha

Author

Listed:
  • Shomesh E. Chaudhuri
  • Terence C. Burnham
  • Andrew W. Lo

Abstract

Advances in financial technology have made tax-loss harvesting more feasible for retail investors than such strategies were in the past. We evaluated the magnitude of this “tax alpha” with the use of historical data from the CRSP monthly database for the 500 securities with the largest market capitalizations from 1926 to 2018. Given long-term and short-term capital gains tax rates of 15% and 35%, respectively, we found that a tax-loss-harvesting strategy yielded a before-transaction-cost tax alpha of 1.08% per year for our sample period. When the strategy was constrained by the “wash sale rule,” the tax alpha decreased from 1.08% per year to 0.82% per year.Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest. Editor’s Note This article was externally reviewed using our double-blind peer-review process. When the article was accepted for publication, the authors thanked the reviewers in their acknowledgments. Andrew Berkin and one anonymous reviewer were the reviewers for this article.Submitted 3 February 2020Accepted 14 April 2020 by Stephen J. Brown

Suggested Citation

  • Shomesh E. Chaudhuri & Terence C. Burnham & Andrew W. Lo, 2020. "An Empirical Evaluation of Tax-Loss-Harvesting Alpha," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(3), pages 99-108, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:76:y:2020:i:3:p:99-108
    DOI: 10.1080/0015198X.2020.1760064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0015198X.2020.1760064
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0015198X.2020.1760064?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:76:y:2020:i:3:p:99-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.