IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v76y2020i3p135-152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decentralized Efficiency? Arbitrage in Bitcoin Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Sinan Krückeberg
  • Peter Scholz

Abstract

Using tick-level bitcoin data from February 2013 through April 2018, we show substantial arbitrage spreads between global bitcoin markets. Spreads follow multiple consistent patterns. Minimum and maximum prices show significant clustering. Spreads increase during the early hours of a day (according to coordinated universal time), when new exchanges enter markets, and following bitcoin heists and hacks. The full year 2017 and the first quarter of 2018 each had exploitable net arbitrage profit opportunities of at least USD380 million that smart money failed to capture. Based on long-term analyses, we also found that bitcoin market inefficiency has increased over time.Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest. Editor’s Note This article was externally reviewed in our double-blind peer-review process. When the article was accepted for publication, the authors thanked the reviewers in their acknowledgments. Daniele Bianchi and Nicola Borri were the reviewers for this article.Submitted 12 September 2019Accepted 18 February 2020 by Stephen J. Brown

Suggested Citation

  • Sinan Krückeberg & Peter Scholz, 2020. "Decentralized Efficiency? Arbitrage in Bitcoin Markets," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(3), pages 135-152, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:76:y:2020:i:3:p:135-152
    DOI: 10.1080/0015198X.2020.1733902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0015198X.2020.1733902
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0015198X.2020.1733902?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:76:y:2020:i:3:p:135-152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.