IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v75y2019i2p20-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spending Policy Customization for Institutional Preferences

Author

Listed:
  • James Yaworski

Abstract

Many research papers have demonstrated the shortcomings of popular spending rules—specifically, the tendency for rules to cause a loss of purchasing power over time. This study identifies the negative correlation between portfolio purchasing power and recommended spending rates as the primary cause of these shortcomings and the source of considerable fiduciary risk. Using this research, I outline a new spending rule, the “purchasing power rule,” which is designed to sustain portfolio value in a reliable manner. I present a framework based on the purchasing power rule for customizing spending rules to match organizational preferences and goals. Disclosure: The author reports no conflicts of interest. Editor’s note This article was externally reviewed using our double-blind peer-review process. When the article was accepted for publication, the author thanked the reviewers in his acknowledgments. Mike Sebastian was one of the reviewers for this article. Submitted 12 June 2018Accepted 6 February 2019 by Stephen J. Brown

Suggested Citation

  • James Yaworski, 2019. "Spending Policy Customization for Institutional Preferences," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 75(2), pages 20-33, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:75:y:2019:i:2:p:20-33
    DOI: 10.1080/0015198X.2019.1581549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0015198X.2019.1581549
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0015198X.2019.1581549?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:75:y:2019:i:2:p:20-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.