IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v74y2018i4p87-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Political Strategies and Return Predictability

Author

Listed:
  • Chansog (Francis) Kim
  • Incheol Kim
  • Christos Pantzalis
  • Jung Chul Park

Abstract

We assess whether observable corporate political strategies can serve as channels of value-relevant political information flow into stock prices and form the basis for profitable return predictability strategies. We document that returns of politically connected firms’ stocks lead those of their non-connected peers, suggesting that information shocks associated with new policies and other political developments become evident first in the stock prices of firms that pursue political strategies and then, with delay, in those of similar, non-connected firms.It's often said that money and power go hand in hand. Now there is hard evidence that investors can achieve outperformance by analyzing the political connectedness of companies.A practitioner's perspective on this article is provided in the In Practice piece "The Predictive Power of Politics" by Phil Davis. Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest. Editor’s Note Submitted 29 September 2017 Accepted 23 July 2018 by Stephen J. Brown This article was externally reviewed using our double-blind peer-review process. When the article was accepted for publication, the authors thanked the reviewers in the acknowledgments. Heiko Bailer and Claude B. Erb, CFA, were the reviewers for this article.

Suggested Citation

  • Chansog (Francis) Kim & Incheol Kim & Christos Pantzalis & Jung Chul Park, 2018. "Corporate Political Strategies and Return Predictability," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(4), pages 87-101, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:74:y:2018:i:4:p:87-101
    DOI: 10.2469/faj.v74.n4.5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2469/faj.v74.n4.5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2469/faj.v74.n4.5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:74:y:2018:i:4:p:87-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.