IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v73y2017i1p73-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Cash Flows Better Stock Return Predictors Than Profits?

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Foerster
  • John Tsagarelis
  • Grant Wang

Abstract

Although various income statement–based measures predict the cross section of stock returns, direct method cash flow measures have even stronger predictive power. We transform indirect method cash flow statements into disaggregated and more direct estimates of cash flows from operations and other sources and form portfolios on the basis of these measures. Stocks in the highest-cash-flow decile outperform those in the lowest by over 10% annually (risk adjusted). Our results are robust to investment horizons and across risk factors and sector controls. We also show that, in addition to operating cash flow information, cash taxes and capital expenditures provide incremental predictive power. Disclosures:John Tsagarelis and Grant Wang are employed by Highstreet Asset Management, an investment management firm that uses empirically based research and the combination of quantitative and fundamental analysis to capture alpha drivers—growth, value, and quality. Proprietary models are based on numerous factors, only a small portion of which are related to the cash flow measure variables and findings in this article.Editor’s note:This article was externally reviewed using our double-blind peer-review process. When the article was accepted for publication, the authors thanked the reviewers in their acknowledgments. Andrew L. Berkin and Heiko Jacobs were the reviewers for this article.Submitted 2 October 2015Accepted 31 May 2016 by Stephen J. Brown

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Foerster & John Tsagarelis & Grant Wang, 2017. "Are Cash Flows Better Stock Return Predictors Than Profits?," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(1), pages 73-99, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:73:y:2017:i:1:p:73-99
    DOI: 10.2469/faj.v73.n1.2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2469/faj.v73.n1.2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2469/faj.v73.n1.2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:73:y:2017:i:1:p:73-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.