IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v71y2015i6p10-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Risk- and Complexity-Rating Framework for Investment Products

Author

Listed:
  • Benedict S.K. Koh
  • Francis Koh
  • David Lee Kuo Chuen
  • Lim Kian Guan
  • David Ng
  • Phoon Kok Fai

Abstract

Many investors who bought such investments as Lehman Brothers’ minibonds did not understand the products’ complicated features. This fact suggests that if the inherent risk and complexity of products’ structure are not clearly understood by investors, they will be unable to make informed decisions. Some practitioners have recently attempted to calibrate product complexity. The authors propose a framework for classifying investment product risk and complexity separately with a list of factors that contribute to these attributes. They demonstrate the framework’s simplicity and usefulness in helping investors make informed decisions, showing that it can be used to calibrate a variety of investment products.Investors often do not have a clear understanding of the complicated features embedded in complex investment products. In the aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis, regulators have increasingly looked for various ways to provide such information, motivated by the need to enhance consumer protection. Although risk indicators are well developed and widely adopted, the financial industry as a whole does not have a common methodology to calibrate the complexity of investment products. In this article, we propose a simple, integrated framework to classify both the risk and the complexity of investment products. Risk is decomposed into six main factors: volatility, liquidity, credit rating, duration, leverage, and the degree of diversification. Product complexity is measured by five basic factors: the number of structural layers, the expansiveness of derivatives used, the availability and use of known valuation models, the number of scenarios determining return outcomes, and the transparency/ease of understanding. We simulated and stress tested the proposed framework with a range of weights for the chosen factors and found it to be technically robust. The framework can be used by industry players to enhance product transparency as well as to offer their clients suitable products, appropriately classified by risk and complexity.Editor’s note: This article was reviewed and accepted by Executive Editor Robert Litterman.

Suggested Citation

  • Benedict S.K. Koh & Francis Koh & David Lee Kuo Chuen & Lim Kian Guan & David Ng & Phoon Kok Fai, 2015. "A Risk- and Complexity-Rating Framework for Investment Products," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(6), pages 10-28, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:71:y:2015:i:6:p:10-28
    DOI: 10.2469/faj.v71.n6.2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2469/faj.v71.n6.2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2469/faj.v71.n6.2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:71:y:2015:i:6:p:10-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.