IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v69y2013i3p14-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mandatory Retirement Savings

Author

Listed:
  • Meir Statman

Abstract

Nudges toward voluntary defined-contribution retirement savings have transformed many nonsavers into savers but have left many behind. The author argues that it is time to switch from libertarian-paternalistic nudges to fully paternalistic shoves. He advocates a retirement savings solution centered on a paternalistic second layer of mandatory private defined-contribution savings accounts in a retirement savings pyramid, above the paternalistic first layer of Social Security and below the libertarian third layer of voluntary savings.Nudges toward voluntary defined-contribution retirement savings have transformed many nonsavers into savers but have left many behind. It is time to switch from libertarian-paternalistic nudges to fully paternalistic shoves. I draw on evidence from the United States and other countries to advocate a retirement savings solution centered on a paternalistic second layer of mandatory private defined-contribution savings accounts in a retirement savings pyramid, above the paternalistic first layer of Social Security and below the libertarian third layer of voluntary savings. Mandatory defined-contribution retirement savings plans exist in Australia, the United Kingdom, Israel, and other countries. Minimum mandatory contributions are set to increase to 12% of employee earnings in Australia, 8% of earnings in the United Kingdom, and more than 18% of earnings in Israel. Indeed, mandatory defined-contribution retirement plans are in effect at many U.S. universities, even if they are not described as such. Universities contribute an average of 10% of employee salaries as “core” contributions, regardless of employee contributions. Additional employee contributions are voluntary at some universities and mandatory at others. Existing mandatory defined-contribution retirement savings plans offer lessons about features worth adopting and features worth avoiding. Features worth adopting include the following:Combined mandatory contributions by employers and employees amounting to a minimum of 12% of earnings.A central agency to administer plans for employees whose employers do not provide defined-contribution retirement savings plans. Default offerings of well-diversified target-date funds set in one-year intervals. Fees not exceeding 30 bps. No borrowing from retirement savings accounts and no cashing out of accounts before retirement age. Enhanced financial literacy without hampering the retirement income of people lacking financial literacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Meir Statman, 2013. "Mandatory Retirement Savings," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(3), pages 14-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:69:y:2013:i:3:p:14-18
    DOI: 10.2469/faj.v69.n3.3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2469/faj.v69.n3.3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2469/faj.v69.n3.3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:69:y:2013:i:3:p:14-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.