IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v68y2012i5p58-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CVA and Wrong-Way Risk

Author

Listed:
  • John Hull
  • Alan White

Abstract

The authors propose a simple model for incorporating wrong-way and right-way risk into the Monte Carlo simulation that is used to calculate credit value adjustment (CVA). The model assumes a relationship between the hazard rate of a counterparty and variables whose values are generated, or can be generated, as part of the Monte Carlo simulation. The authors present numerical results for portfolios of 25 instruments dependent on five underlying market variables.Credit value adjustment, or CVA, is the reduction in the value of a dealer’s portfolio of derivative transactions with a counterparty to reflect the possibility that the counterparty will default. DVA (debit or debt value adjustment) is the increase in the value of the portfolio due to the possibility of a default by the dealer. In this article, we explain the way CVA and DVA calculations are carried out. For CVA calculations, it is necessary to divide the remaining life of the derivative portfolio into a number of time steps and to calculate (1) the probability of a counterparty default during each time step and (2) the expected exposure of the dealer to the counterparty at the midpoint of each time step. The probabilities of default are estimated from credit spreads. The expected exposure is calculated by carrying out a Monte Carlo simulation of the market variables on which the value of the portfolio depends.The simplest assumption in CVA calculations is that the probability of a counterparty default at a point in time is independent of the exposure at that time. Wrong-way risk arises from a positive correlation between probability of default and exposure, and right-way risk arises from a negative correlation between probability of default and exposure. Most approaches for taking account of wrong-way and right-way risk make adjustments to the expected exposure. Specifically, the expected exposure conditional on default is assumed to be different from the unconditional expected exposure.We use a different approach. We assume that the counterparty’s hazard rate at a particular time (which is a measure of its default probability) depends on the values of variables that are included, or could be included, in the Monte Carlo simulation of the underlying market variables. There are a number of alternative ways in which these variables can be chosen. For example, for a gold producer, it may make sense to relate the hazard rate to the price of gold. In other circumstances, the hazard rate could be related to a company’s stock price. Yet another possibility is to relate the hazard rate to the value of the dealer’s portfolio with the counterparty. The nature of the relationship between the hazard rate and the chosen variable (or variables) can be estimated subjectively or by using historical data. We explain how the relationship can be chosen so that it is consistent with the initial term structure of credit spreads.We present numerical results for the case in which the hazard rate is assumed to depend on the value of the dealer’s portfolio with the counterparty. We considered portfolios of 25 instruments dependent on five underlying market variables and found that wrong-way risk and right-way risk have a significant effect on the variables used to calculate CVA as well as on CVA itself. We also found that the percentage effect depends on the collateral arrangements.

Suggested Citation

  • John Hull & Alan White, 2012. "CVA and Wrong-Way Risk," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(5), pages 58-69, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:68:y:2012:i:5:p:58-69
    DOI: 10.2469/faj.v68.n5.6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2469/faj.v68.n5.6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2469/faj.v68.n5.6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:68:y:2012:i:5:p:58-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.