Author
Abstract
Practitioners of the investment management profession are underperforming for their clients and for their profession because of three errors: defining their mission as “beating the market,” allowing the values of their profession to be eclipsed by the economics of the business, and not providing much-needed investment counseling. The solution is to incorporate investment counseling into the heart of their client–manager relationship.Practitioners of the investment management profession, despite their manifest talents and notoriously hard work, risk underperforming for their clients and for themselves because of three errors—two errors of commission and one error of omission.The first error of commission is to define our professional role as beating the market. Increasingly extensive data show that markets have changed and most managers are not succeeding at this task.The second error of commission is that the values of our profession are increasingly eclipsed by the profoundly different disciplines of our business. Significantly, because investors can obtain market-matching index funds at very low fees (less than 10 bps), what investors really buy from active managers is risk-adjusted incremental returns. Therefore, we need to recognize a daunting reality: 1 percent fees as a percentage of assets equals over 10 percent of returns and 100 percent of incremental, risk-adjusted fees. This is not an easily defended position, particularly if we define our mission as “beat-the-market performance.”Our third and most important error is an error of omission. Investors make repetitive mistakes that investment professionals could easily help them avoid by providing sensible investment counseling as part—ideally the lead part—of the overall relationship.Incorporating investment counseling into the heart of the client–manager relationship greatly increases the chances for good results for the client and professional satisfaction for the manager and, therefore, longer-lasting and better business for investment managers.
Suggested Citation
Charles D. Ellis, 2011.
"The Winners’ Game,"
Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(4), pages 11-17, July.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:67:y:2011:i:4:p:11-17
DOI: 10.2469/faj.v67.n4.3
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:67:y:2011:i:4:p:11-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.