Author
Listed:
- Darshana D. Palkar
- Stephen E. Wilcox
Abstract
An accurate forecast of real return requires that accounting and debt adjustments be made to reported earnings. This article presents methodologies that investors can use to estimate the accounting and debt adjustments for individual companies and offers evidence, derived from a predictive regression model, that investors should consider these adjustments important. The article also reviews the use of nonfinancial corporate debt and makes the case that investors should view the use of debt by nonfinancial companies more positively than they currently do.In this article, the authors present methodologies that investors can use to estimate the accounting and debt adjustments for individual companies. These adjustments should be considered important because survey data have shown that earnings are preferred over cash flow, dividends, and book value as a valuation input.The accounting adjustments reflect the adjustments that must be made to GAAP-reported earnings to convert them from a historical-cost into a current-cost accounting system. A current-cost accounting system requires that assets be valued at their replacement cost. Thus, these adjustments would reduce reported earnings when prices are increasing.The authors’ first accounting adjustment is to cost of goods sold for those companies that choose the FIFO method of inventory accounting. The adjustment uses the U.S. Producer Price Index for crude materials to inflate beginning inventory. In estimating this adjustment, the authors incorporated a weighting scheme to reflect the importance of the FIFO method in determining inventory value.The second accounting adjustment is to depreciation expense. The authors used a methodology that converts financial statement depreciation charges into an approximation of current-cost depreciation. This methodology requires an estimation of the average age of fixed assets and then grosses up their value to reflect inflation as measured by the GDP implicit price deflator for nonresidential fixed investment. This adjustment reflects how depreciation expense would change if it was based on the replacement cost of fixed assets rather than on their acquisition cost.The debt adjustment reflects inflation’s effect on the real value of creditor claims; GAAP-based earnings reported by leveraged companies will overstate the true cost of debt because they do not reflect the benefit that accrues to shareholders from being able to repay a fixed amount of principal with a currency that has been devalued by inflation. The authors used a company’s net debt position as the theoretically correct measure of debt and multiplied it by the expected rate of inflation to determine the debt adjustment. Data for the expected rate of inflation are the one-year-ahead inflation forecasts for the chain-weighted GDP price index from the Survey of Professional Forecasters (www.phil.frb.org/econ/spf/index.html).The authors used predictive regression models to test the importance of the accounting and debt adjustments as predictors of real returns. Their results show that the coefficient estimates for the adjustments are statistically significant over the period of the study. Thus, the recommended adjustments to GAAP-based reported earnings should be considered important by investors. The results are particularly robust for the debt adjustment because the coefficient estimate for that variable is statistically significant at the 1 percent level in all regressions.Over the period of the study, average real returns were highest for the quintile of companies with the highest debt-to-market-capitalization ratio. For those companies that increased their debt-to-market-capitalization ratio, the authors found that the quintile of companies with the greatest increase had the highest average real returns over the period of the study. The authors believe that their findings support the contention that debt usage should be viewed in a more favorable light by both investors and nonfinancial companies.
Suggested Citation
Darshana D. Palkar & Stephen E. Wilcox, 2009.
"Adjusted Earnings Yields and Real Rates of Return,"
Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(5), pages 66-79, September.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:65:y:2009:i:5:p:66-79
DOI: 10.2469/faj.v65.n5.3
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:65:y:2009:i:5:p:66-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.