IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v65y2009i5p24-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

REIT Momentum and the Performance of Real Estate Mutual Funds

Author

Listed:
  • Jeroen Derwall
  • Joop Huij
  • Dirk Brounen
  • Wessel Marquering

Abstract

REITs exhibit a strong and prevalent momentum effect that is not captured by conventional factor models. This REIT momentum anomaly hampers proper judgments about the performance of actively managed REIT portfolios. In contrast, a REIT momentum factor adds incremental explanatory power to performance attribution models for REIT portfolios. Using this factor, this study finds that REIT momentum explains a great deal of the abnormal returns that actively managed REIT mutual funds earn in aggregate. Accounting for exposure to REIT momentum also materially influences cross-sectional comparisons of the performances of REIT mutual funds. This study has important implications for performance evaluation, alpha–beta separation, and manager selection and compensation.Managers of such real estate portfolios as real estate mutual funds are compensated for the returns they produce on their portfolios relative to a benchmark portfolio’s return. This study focuses on the REIT industry to illustrate that momentum effects in U.S. REIT returns can affect portfolio performance attribution.We first confirmed that the presence of a strong and prevalent momentum effect in REIT returns poses a challenge to performance attribution based on common factors. A REIT momentum strategy, which buys REITs with the highest past return and sells short REITs with the lowest past return, produces a return that is economically larger than that of a common-stock momentum strategy. The common-stock momentum factor, which is explicitly designed to capture momentum effects, does not suffice to capture the REIT momentum anomaly. Instead, return differences among portfolios with different REIT momentum characteristics are best captured by a REIT momentum factor.To gauge the practical implications of the REIT momentum anomaly, we demonstrated how the inclusion of our REIT-specific momentum factor in performance attribution models affects estimates of the value added by active REIT portfolio managers. Using a sample of U.S. REIT mutual funds, we found that REIT momentum explains a great deal of the abnormal returns that such mutual funds earn according to studies that did not account for REIT momentum. Consistent with our expectations, REIT mutual fund returns are better explained by a REIT momentum factor than by the conventional common-stock momentum factor. The positive alphas that REIT funds deliver under conventional factor models dissipate under a model that includes the three Fama–French factors and a REIT momentum factor. Finally, we showed that a consideration of REIT momentum affects our understanding of cross-sectional variation in the performance of REIT funds. Specifically, REIT mutual funds with relatively high past returns continue to earn higher returns than the competition because of greater exposure to the REIT momentum factor. Moreover, the common-stock factor model and the factor model proposed in this study substantially disagree about the rankings of REIT mutual funds by their alphas. These results imply that factoring REIT momentum into performance attribution has important implications for REIT performance evaluation and manager selection and compensation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeroen Derwall & Joop Huij & Dirk Brounen & Wessel Marquering, 2009. "REIT Momentum and the Performance of Real Estate Mutual Funds," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(5), pages 24-34, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:65:y:2009:i:5:p:24-34
    DOI: 10.2469/faj.v65.n5.4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2469/faj.v65.n5.4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2469/faj.v65.n5.4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:65:y:2009:i:5:p:24-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.