Author
Abstract
The key question about the current financial crisis is how so many investors could have mispriced risk in the same way and at the same time. This article looks at the work of Fischer Black for insight into this problem. In particular, Black considered why the “law of large numbers” does not always apply to expectations in a market setting. Black’s hypothesis that a financial crisis can arise from extreme bad luck is more plausible than is usually realized. In this view, such factors as the real estate market are of secondary importance for understanding the economic crisis, and the financial side of the crisis may have roots in the real economy as a whole.The key question about the current financial crisis is how so many investors could have mispriced risk in the same way and at the same time. This article looks at the work of Fischer Black for insight into this problem. The crisis is plausibly the result of negative shocks that affected many sectors of the economy at the same time. In particular, plans in the real economy were based on systematic overoptimism, which placed many investors in excessively vulnerable, overleveraged positions. Black’s work, which considered why the law of large numbers does not always apply to expectations in a market setting, provides a framework for thinking about how systematic overcommitment is possible. Black’s hypothesis that a financial crisis can arise from extreme bad luck is more plausible than is usually realized. In this view, such factors as the real estate market are of secondary importance for understanding the current economic crisis. Although the crisis showed up in different parts of the real economy at different speeds, those different speeds do not necessarily have causal significance. The current downturn first appeared in the subprime mortgage sector simply because those mortgagors were the first to run out of money and were unable to maintain their unduly optimistic plans.
Suggested Citation
Tyler Cowen, 2009.
"A Simple Theory of the Financial Crisis; or, Why Fischer Black Still Matters,"
Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(3), pages 17-20, May.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:65:y:2009:i:3:p:17-20
DOI: 10.2469/faj.v65.n3.3
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:65:y:2009:i:3:p:17-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.