IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v63y2007i2p48-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Causes and Seasonality of Momentum Profits

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Sias

Abstract

With Januaries (a month in which lagged “losers” typically outperform lagged “winners”) excluded, the average monthly return to a momentum strategy for U.S. stocks was found to be 59 bps for non-quarter-ending months but 310 bps for quarter-ending months. The pattern was stronger for stocks with high levels of institutional trading and was particularly strong in December. The results suggest that window dressing by institutional investors and tax-loss selling contribute to stock return momentum. Investors using a momentum strategy should focus on quarter-ending months and securities with high levels of institutional trading.Stocks exhibit return momentum: Lagged “winners” (i.e., securities in the top performance decile based on returns over the previous six months) tend to subsequently outperform lagged “losers” (i.e., securities in the bottom lagged six-month performance decile). Both tax-loss selling in December and window dressing by institutional investors in quarter-ending months may contribute to stock return momentum. In the case of tax-loss selling, investors (both individual investors and some institutional investors) may favor selling lagged losers in December to realize taxable losses and may avoid selling lagged winners in December to forestall recognizing taxable gains. This behavior may contribute to return momentum in December. In the case of institutional investors, their window-dressing behavior also may contribute to momentum-profit seasonality. At quarter-end, and especially year-end, institutional investors may want to abandon lagged losers to avoid reporting “embarrassing” stocks in their end-of-quarter or end-of-year holdings. Similarly, managers may buy lagged winners to appear as if they held respectable or “winning” stocks throughout the period.This study found that the profitability of momentum strategies in the past 20 years arose primarily from the last month of each quarter, which is consistent with the hypothesis that year-end tax-motivated trading and institutional window dressing contribute to stock return momentum. Momentum profits were, on average, negative when quarter-ending months (March, June, September, and December) were excluded from the sample. January, a month when lagged losers typically outperform lagged winners, explains part of the negative momentum profits for non-quarter-ending months. Even after excluding January from the sample, however, momentum profits from quarter-ending months averaged more than five times the momentum profits from non-quarter-ending months.The seasonal pattern was particularly strong in stocks with high levels of institutional trading and in December. The momentum-profit seasonality and the relationship between this seasonality and institutional trading suggest that tax-loss selling and institutional window dressing play substantial roles in driving stock return momentum. Investors attempting to exploit return momentum should thus focus their efforts on quarter-ending months and on securities with high levels of institutional trading.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Sias, 2007. "Causes and Seasonality of Momentum Profits," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(2), pages 48-54, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:63:y:2007:i:2:p:48-54
    DOI: 10.2469/faj.v63.n2.4521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2469/faj.v63.n2.4521
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2469/faj.v63.n2.4521?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:63:y:2007:i:2:p:48-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.