IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v63y2007i1p18-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Where Were We?

Author

Listed:
  • Charles D. Ellis

Abstract

As professionals, we owe it to our profession and our society to speak out clearly and effectively on investment-related issues that affect the lives and well-being of our fellow citizens and neighbors. We missed a great opportunity to advocate timely reform in retirement plans, but we still have the chance to advocate swift adoption of the new rules others have promulgated.The real test of a profession is how well it serves laypersons. As defined-contribution (DC) plans replaced defined-benefit (DB) pension plans, the investment management profession took no action and made no pleas for change in retirement security plans, while 20 million workers had no coverage, another 20 million workers were inadequately covered, 10 million future retirees were far too concentrated in one stock (in the same company on whom they depended for their jobs), and more than 10 million were in savings vehicles not investment vehicles.The absurdities in the retirement scene can be partly “explained” by the separate regulatory concepts and priorities of two parts of our federal government—the U.S. SEC and the Department of Labor—with control over different aspects of 401(k) plans. But although “territoriality” may explain the large mistakes made by competing parts of government, it cannot excuse our profession’s passive acceptance of the large-scale, multiyear neglect of the center of our professional realm of interest: long-term investing by lay investors for retirement security.As professionals, we all agree that individuals can benefit greatly (and our society rightly wants them to benefit greatly, so we provide large tax incentives) fromsaving—regular and repetitive,long-term, “age-appropriate” investing,diversification—the one true “free lunch,” andbenign neglect of such costly “opportunities” as switching funds and market timing.The U.S. Congress has, no thanks to us, taken action to advanceall these key points. Now, after an overlong delay, the brakes on our involvement in lay education have been taken off, so we can go immediately to Phase II: swift implementation of the Congressional ideas by plan sponsors—the people investment managers talk with several times every day. Here is what we can do now to accelerate and broaden use of the opportunities Congress has given our fellow citizens:Urge each company we cover as analysts or invest in as portfolio managers to take bold action to enroll all employees in 401(k) plans and with employees’ participating at the maximum.Do the same with our colleges and universities.Urge our employers to provide life-cycle funds.Celebrate plan sponsors who take the lead.Let us work together to help millions of workers catch up on providing the financial security they will need. Action does matter.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles D. Ellis, 2007. "Where Were We?," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(1), pages 18-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:63:y:2007:i:1:p:18-20
    DOI: 10.2469/faj.v63.n1.4402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2469/faj.v63.n1.4402
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2469/faj.v63.n1.4402?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:63:y:2007:i:1:p:18-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.