Author
Listed:
- Jeremy J. Siegel
- Jeremy D. Schwartz
Abstract
The S&P 500 Index is continually updated, with approximately 20 companies added each year and an equal number dropped. In the study reported here, the returns to all 500 of the original S&P 500 companies and returns to the continually updated index were calculated from March 1957 through 2003. Contrary to earlier research, this study found that the buy-and-hold returns of the 500 original companies have been higher than the returns to the continually updated S&P 500 and with lower risk. Furthermore, the original companies in 9 of the 10 industry sectors outperformed the new companies added to the index. The S&P 500 Index, first compiled in March 1957, is the most widely used benchmark for measuring the performance of large-capitalization, U.S.-based stocks. The index of 500 stocks is continually updated; approximately 20 new companies that meet the Standard & Poor's Corporation criteria for market value, earnings, and liquidity are added each year, and an equal number are deleted because they fall below these standards or are eliminated by mergers or other corporate changes.We calculated the returns of all 500 of the original S&P 500 companies and of the new companies subsequently added to the index. Contrary to earlier studies, we found that the buy-and-hold returns of the 500 original companies have been higher than the returns of the continually updated S&P 500 and with lower risk. Moreover, the new companies added to the S&P 500 since 1957 have underperformed the original companies in 9 of the 10 industrial sectors making up the index.We also found that less than one-third of a sector's return from 1957 through 2003 can be attributed to the expansion and contraction of the sector's market value relative to the S&P 500. Sector differences in dividend yields, capitalizations, and number of companies entering and exiting the sector accounted for more than two-thirds of the changes in market return.Reasons for the underperformance of the continually updated S&P 500 include price pressures when the addition of a company to the index is announced, investor overoptimism about certain stocks and industries, and the changes in sector weighting since 1957. Over time, the original S&P 500 companies became more heavily weighted with high-dividend-paying and low-P/E (value) stocks, particularly large oil producers. Indeed, this research supports the finding that value stocks have outperformed growth stocks on a risk-adjusted basis since 1957.
Suggested Citation
Jeremy J. Siegel & Jeremy D. Schwartz, 2006.
"Long-Term Returns on the Original S&P 500 Companies,"
Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(1), pages 18-31, January.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:62:y:2006:i:1:p:18-31
DOI: 10.2469/faj.v62.n1.4055
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:62:y:2006:i:1:p:18-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.