IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v60y2004i2p32-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global Risk Factors and the Cost of Capital

Author

Listed:
  • Kees G. Koedijk
  • Mathijs A. van Dijk

Abstract

Analysis of 3,300 stocks from nine industrialized countries over the 1980–99 period indicates that whether the capital asset pricing model or some form of international CAPM is used makes little difference in the cost-of-capital estimate for most companies in most countries. The international CAPM yielded an estimate of the cost of equity capital that was significantly different from that of the domestic CAPM in only 4–5 percent of the sample companies. For the vast majority of companies, the domestic market factor is an adequate benchmark against which to measure an individual company's exposure to both global market and currency risk factors. International financial markets are becoming integrated; hence, global risk factors are increasingly important for portfolio selection and asset pricing. Recent research in the empirical finance literature confirms that global risk factors—notably, the global market portfolio and exchange rate risk—are indeed important determinants of asset returns. This research suggests that practitioners interested in estimating a company's cost of equity capital should use an international version of the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) that includes global market and currency risk factors. Recent survey evidence indicates, however, that the single-factor CAPM, in which the local market factor is the only priced risk factor, is still the dominant model used in practice.From a practical perspective, then, whether incorporating global risk factors would significantly alter cost-of-capital computations is of considerable importance. But empirical literature on the subject is virtually nonexistent. We report empirical evidence on the practical effects of incorporating global risk factors in cost-of-capital computations.We analyzed almost 3,300 stocks from nine industrialized countries over the 1980−99 period to discover whether the single-factor domestic CAPM provided a substantially different cost of capital than provided by two versions of the international CAPM—a single-factor ICAPM in which the global market factor is the only priced risk factor and a multifactor ICAPM that includes currency risk factors as well as the global market factor.We found that the choice of model does not make a difference if the domestic market factor effectively captures an individual company's exposure to the global risk factors. In the case of the single-factor ICAPM, our sample yielded an estimate of the cost of equity capital that was significantly different from that of the domestic CAPM for only approximately 4 percent of the companies. In the case of the multifactor ICAPM, the difference was significant for only 5 percent of the companies.The conclusion is that for the vast majority of companies, the domestic market factor is an adequate benchmark against which to measure an individual company's exposure to both global market and currency risk factors. Incorporating global risk factors into cost-of-capital estimations led to an adjustment of roughly 50 bps a year on average for the U.S. sample and 70–100 bps a year for the other countries. Adjustments of this magnitude easily fall inside the confidence interval associated with actual cost-of-capital computations. Specifically for U.S. companies, the change in the cost-of-capital estimate from using an ICAPM is so small that we can conclude that global risk factors do not really matter for computing the cost of capital of U.S. companies.Although empirical evidence indicates that security returns are more and more driven by industry factors than by country factors, we contend that the domestic CAPM is not likely to become redundant in the context of valuation and capital budgeting. This finding has important implications for financial analysts, because using a multifactor ICAPM for computations of the cost of capital can be cumbersome and estimating currency risk premiums and exposures is extraordinarily complicated. Our study reveals that for a large number of companies, practitioners can rely on the straightforward single-factor domestic CAPM for calculating the cost of equity capital.

Suggested Citation

  • Kees G. Koedijk & Mathijs A. van Dijk, 2004. "Global Risk Factors and the Cost of Capital," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(2), pages 32-38, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:60:y:2004:i:2:p:32-38
    DOI: 10.2469/faj.v60.n2.2607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2469/faj.v60.n2.2607
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2469/faj.v60.n2.2607?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:60:y:2004:i:2:p:32-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.