IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v58y2002i2p86-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emerging Markets: When Are They Worth It?

Author

Listed:
  • C. Mitchell Conover
  • Gerald R. Jensen
  • Robert R. Johnson

Abstract

Using 24 years of data, we show that emerging market equities are a worthy addition to a U.S. investor's portfolio of developed market equities. Specifically, portfolio returns increased by approximately 1.5 percentage points a year when emerging country equities were included in the investment set. When we considered U.S. Federal Reserve monetary policy, however, we found that the benefits of investing in emerging markets accrued almost exclusively during periods of restrictive U.S. monetary policy. During periods of expansive U.S. monetary policy, the benefits to a U.S. investor of holding emerging market equities were trivial. An implication of our findings is that evaluating monetary conditions is a necessary prerequisite to identifying an optimal allocation of assets to international equities. The study we report reexamined the benefits to U.S. investors of investing in international equities, with a focus on emerging market stocks and on differences in returns and risks between periods of expansive U.S. monetary policy and periods of restrictive U.S. monetary policy. Several past studies have shown that international equities offer diversification benefits for U.S. investors, primarily because of the relatively low correlation of non-U.S. with U.S. stock returns. Emerging market equities have been shown to have particularly low correlations with the U.S. stock market. A troubling aspect of the past correlation findings, however, is that the correlations of non-U.S. and U.S. equity markets differ substantially over time. Of even more concern is the finding that the correlations tend to increase during periods when the markets are exhibiting the worst performance. Thus, the benefits of international diversification may be lowest when diversification is most needed.Our analysis had two basic objectives: to quantify the overall benefit of investing in emerging markets and to determine whether the benefit fluctuates systematically with changes in U.S. monetary conditions. Based on recent evidence that shows stock market performance in developed countries to be systematically related to broad changes in monetary policy, we hypothesized that the benefits of international diversification may be related to changes in U.S. monetary conditions. In particular, previous findings confirm that, in the developed markets, equities perform much better (worse) than average during expansive (restrictive) monetary periods—perhaps because the monetary authorities in developed countries tend to cooperate in setting monetary policy. We argued, however, that the monetary policy decisions of developing country monetary authorities are less likely to coincide with their counterparts in developed countries. Thus, relative to the developed markets, emerging markets might provide a more effective hedge against the poor performance exhibited by U.S. equities during periods of restrictive U.S. monetary policy.The sample used in this analysis compares favorably with past research, based on both breadth and length of time period covered. We considered returns to 20 emerging markets over a 24-year study period, whereas past studies relied on approximately half as many countries and a much shorter time frame. Therefore, our findings are less influenced by extreme observations that may have occurred in a particular time period or a particular country.Our results indicate that adding emerging market equities to a portfolio that consists of developed country equities adds a net benefit of 1.5-2.0 percentage points (pps) a year to returns. This finding confirms the view that emerging market equities are an attractive diversification vehicle for U.S. investors. Furthermore, we found that emerging market equities represent a significant weight in both high-risk and low-risk efficient portfolios, which indicates that emerging market equities are beneficial even for equity investors with relatively high levels of risk aversion.A more surprising result is that the benefit associated with investing in emerging market equities accrues almost entirely during periods of restrictive U.S. monetary policy; we found the net benefit to be more than 4 pps annually. During periods of expansive U.S. monetary policy, emerging markets added only a trivial improvement to portfolio performance (approximately 0.2 pps a year). This finding indicates that a necessary prerequisite to determining the appropriate allocation to international equities is to monitor U.S. monetary conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Mitchell Conover & Gerald R. Jensen & Robert R. Johnson, 2002. "Emerging Markets: When Are They Worth It?," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(2), pages 86-95, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:58:y:2002:i:2:p:86-95
    DOI: 10.2469/faj.v58.n2.2525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2469/faj.v58.n2.2525
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2469/faj.v58.n2.2525?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:58:y:2002:i:2:p:86-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.