IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v57y2001i5p20-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Goodwill Amortization and the Usefulness of Earnings

Author

Listed:
  • Ross Jennings
  • Marc LeClere
  • Robert B. Thompson

Abstract

This study provides evidence of the effect of goodwill amortization on the usefulness of earnings data as an indicator of share value for a large sample of publicly traded companies over the 1993–98 period. This issue is of special interest because the Financial Accounting Standards Board recently adopted new accounting standards that eliminate the systematic amortization of goodwill in favor of a requirement to review goodwill for impairment when circumstances warrant. We found that earnings before goodwill amortization explain significantly more of the observed distribution of share prices than earnings after goodwill amortization and that when share valuations are based on earnings alone, goodwill amortization simply adds noise to the measure. These results suggest that eliminating goodwill amortization from the computation of net income will not reduce its usefulness to investors and analysts as a summary indicator of share value. Analysts frequently face the problem of how to consider goodwill amortization in their financial analysis. For many years, financial statement preparers and users have criticized the accounting requirement to amortize purchased goodwill against revenues over a period not to exceed 40 years. Critics have argued that goodwill may not decline in value and that, even if it does, the arbitrary amounts recorded periodically as goodwill amortization are unlikely to reflect that decline. In this view, goodwill amortization simply adds noise to earnings, thereby reducing their usefulness to investors. Accounting standard setters, in contrast, have until recently maintained that goodwill is likely to be a wasting asset in most circumstances and that recording goodwill amortization makes reported earnings more useful to investors by reflecting its decline in value. We provide empirical evidence as to which of these views is more consistent with the way in which investors price securities.This issue is of current interest to investors and analysts because of a recent change in the accounting rules for purchased goodwill. Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the reported earnings of acquiring companies will no longer include charges for goodwill amortization. Goodwill acquired in a business combination is recognized as an asset, as in the past, but once it is recognized, the asset remains on the balance sheet indefinitely, subject only to review for impairment when circumstances warrant. Thus, the question arises of whether excluding goodwill amortization from reported earnings will enhance or detract from its usefulness to investors.To investigate this issue, we document the extent to which variation in stock prices is explained by earnings before goodwill amortization and by reported earnings, which includes goodwill amortization. Our analysis, based on a large sample of publicly traded companies reporting purchased goodwill in the six-year period of 1993–1998, involved comparing R2s from two cross-sectional regressions—one of stock price on earnings per share before goodwill amortization and the other of stock price on reported earnings. In interpreting the results of these comparisons, we assumed that prices reflect all value-relevant public information, so the earnings measure that explains more of the variation in stock prices can be viewed as the more useful summary indicator of share value.Our results provide evidence consistent with the criticisms of the previous accounting rules for goodwill. In each year and for the six-year period as a whole, earnings before goodwill amortization explain more of the variation in share prices than reported earnings, and for each year, the difference in explanatory power is statistically significant. Moreover, when we regressed stock prices on earnings before goodwill amortization and on goodwill amortization, we found that the estimated coefficient (valuation multiple) on earnings before goodwill amortization was large and highly significant whereas the estimated coefficient on goodwill amortization was statistically indistinguishable from zero. This finding strongly suggests that goodwill amortization merely adds noise to reported earnings. Overall, these results indicate that the recently adopted reporting rules for purchased goodwill are likely to increase the usefulness of earnings as a summary indicator of share value.

Suggested Citation

  • Ross Jennings & Marc LeClere & Robert B. Thompson, 2001. "Goodwill Amortization and the Usefulness of Earnings," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(5), pages 20-28, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:57:y:2001:i:5:p:20-28
    DOI: 10.2469/faj.v57.n5.2478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2469/faj.v57.n5.2478
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2469/faj.v57.n5.2478?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:57:y:2001:i:5:p:20-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.