IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v57y2001i1p11-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hedge Fund Performance: 1990–1999

Author

Listed:
  • Bing Liang

Abstract

Using a large database, I studied hedge fund performance and risk during an almost 10-year period from 1990 to mid-1999. The empirical results show that hedge funds had an annual return of 14.2 percent in this period, compared with 18.8 percent for the S&P 500 Index. The S&P 500 is much more volatile, however, than hedge funds as a whole. Annual survivorship bias for hedge funds was 2.43 percent. I examined year 1998 in detail because hedge funds were heavily affected by the global financial market tumble in that year. For example, the highest volatility for hedge fund returns occurred in 1998, and more funds died and fewer were born in 1998 than in any other year of the period studied. Few funds changed their fee structures. In those that did, the fee changes were performance related; poor performers lowered their incentive fees. In the study reported here, I used a database containing more than 2,000 hedge funds to examine their performance during the period from January 1990 to July 1999. The empirical results show that hedge funds had an annual return of 14.2 percent in this time period, compared with 18.8 percent for the S&P 500 Index. The S&P 500 was much more volatile, however, than the group of hedge funds as a whole. The standard deviation of the hedge fund returns was 1.67 percent a month, whereas the standard deviation for the index was 3.89 percent a month.This study documented an annual survivorship bias of 2.43 percent for hedge funds from 1994 to 1999. That is, studies based on current funds will overstate fund performance by only 2.43 percent on an annual basis. Because data vendors started to collect data on defunct funds only in 1994, survivorship studies are meaningful only if their data begin after 1993.The article examines 1998 in detail because hedge funds were heavily affected by the global financial market tumble in that year; hedge fund returns in 1998 were the most volatile of the period. The loss in August when Russian debt defaulted reached 4.88 percent for the funds as a group. More funds died and fewer funds were born in 1998 than in any other year during the 10-year period.Few hedge funds change their fee structures; their management fees and incentive fees tend to be stable over time. For example, of the 2,016 funds studied here, only 12 funds changed management and/or incentive fees from 1997 to 1998. The fee changes were performance related; poorly performing funds lowered their incentive fees.

Suggested Citation

  • Bing Liang, 2001. "Hedge Fund Performance: 1990–1999," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(1), pages 11-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:57:y:2001:i:1:p:11-18
    DOI: 10.2469/faj.v57.n1.2415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2469/faj.v57.n1.2415
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2469/faj.v57.n1.2415?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:57:y:2001:i:1:p:11-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.