IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v56y2000i5p28-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Probability of Limit-Order Execution

Author

Listed:
  • Jin-Wan Cho
  • Edward Nelling

Abstract

Market orders and limit orders are the two main types of orders investors use to buy or sell U.S. equities. In choosing between the types, investors must weigh the price improvement associated with a limit order against the probability that the order will not be executed. In the study reported here, we examined the probability of limit-order execution and the expected benefit to limit orders for a sample of stocks traded on the NYSE. Results indicate that the longer a limit order is outstanding, the less likely it is to be executed. The probability of execution is higher for sell orders than for buy orders, lower when the limit price is farther away from the prevailing quote, lower for large trades, higher when spreads are wide, and higher in periods of high price volatility. Order-placement strategy and trade execution are important issues in equity investing. The two main types of orders that investors use to buy or sell U.S. equities are market orders and limit orders. Effective trading with limit orders requires the investor to judge the costs and benefits of using limit orders versus market orders. The goal of our research was to estimate the benefit associated with limit orders-a benefit that may be offset by the opportunity cost of immediacy provided by market orders and the probability that the limit order will not be executed. This assessment of execution probability is likely to be influenced by a number of factors in the market, including the desired price, the prices at which other investors are willing to buy or sell the security, and the size of the intended trade.We used the TORQ (trades, orders, revisions, and quotes) data for NYSE securities to address execution probability. These data contain detailed order, transaction, and quote information on 144 NYSE stocks for the period November 1990 through January 1991. Because of the large number of observations, we randomly selected 10 stocks to study. We examined the waiting time until order execution by using duration analysis, a statistical technique that is appropriate when examining the passage of time until an event occurs.We found that the longer a limit order is outstanding, the less likely it is to be executed. The probability of execution is higher for sell orders than for buy orders, lower when the limit price is farther away from the prevailing quote, lower for large trades, higher when spreads are wide, and higher in periods of great price volatility. We also found that the average expected price improvement from a limit order over a market order is greater at the beginning of the trading day, in periods of high price volatility, in the presence of wide bid–ask spreads, and for large orders.Our results suggest that investors seeking the best possible order-placement approach should carefully consider the probability of limit-order execution. More formal attempts to quantify this probability might be useful, especially for large orders. Investors might also wish to attempt to quantify the opportunity costs of immediate trade execution, which they forgo when they place a limit order instead of a market order.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin-Wan Cho & Edward Nelling, 2000. "The Probability of Limit-Order Execution," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(5), pages 28-33, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:56:y:2000:i:5:p:28-33
    DOI: 10.2469/faj.v56.n5.2387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2469/faj.v56.n5.2387
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2469/faj.v56.n5.2387?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:56:y:2000:i:5:p:28-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.