IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v56y2000i2p77-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Finding Firm Value without a Pro Forma Analysis (corrected)

Author

Listed:
  • Tom Arnold
  • Jerry James

Abstract

We present a firm value calculator (FVC) that uses applications of growth-annuity and growth-perpetuity equations. The FVC provides the same detailed analysis of firm value as the more complicated pro forma analysis and can thus replace a pro forma analysis or be used to check or correct it. The FVC can be easily implemented—through either a computer spreadsheet or a handheld calculator. The algorithmic nature of the FVC may also be implemented through computer programming to quickly produce a large number of analyses, which can save a practitioner a great deal of time when many companies are to be analyzed or compared. Pro forma analysis is frequently used to assess the value of a company or a proposed project, but it is a tedious endeavor involving spreadsheets. In pro forma analysis, the analyst often needs to worry about the issue of the spreadsheet cell calculations as much as the assumptions that drive the analysis. The mechanics of the spreadsheet may be mundane, but the pro forma results are useless unless the mechanics are carried out correctly. The analyst ordinarily has no other way to assure accuracy but to continuously check and recheck the individual cell calculations.We present a firm value calculator (FVC) based on free cash flow that uses applications of growth-annuity and growth-perpetuity equations. The FVC provides the same detailed firm value analysis as the more complicated pro forma analysis, but it is so simple that it can be performed on a handheld calculator or readily programmed into a spreadsheet software package. The algorithmic format of the FVC makes it amenable to many programming platforms. It can be used as the sole measure of company value or to check the figures of an existing pro forma analysis.The FVC can save practitioners—whether financial analysts or corporate financial managers—a great deal of time when they must analyze many companies. When practitioners do not need to focus on mechanical accuracy, they can spend more time on assessing the more important fundamental logic of the analysis.To provide a basis for comparing the two methods, we first set up the typical assumptions for a pro forma analysis and carry out the analysis. We then develop the necessary equations for the FVC. The equations are derived in a clear, logical fashion that anyone with a basic knowledge of the time value of money can readily understand. Next, we compare the FVC final and intermediate calculations with those calculations performed under the initial pro forma analysis and show that the FVC produces the same results with much less effort.Although we focus solely on free cash flow, other cash flow analyses can be readily developed. Sensitivity analysis can also be easily implemented, particularly with current versions of spreadsheet software.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Arnold & Jerry James, 2000. "Finding Firm Value without a Pro Forma Analysis (corrected)," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(2), pages 77-84, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:56:y:2000:i:2:p:77-84
    DOI: 10.2469/faj.v56.n2.2345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2469/faj.v56.n2.2345
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2469/faj.v56.n2.2345?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:56:y:2000:i:2:p:77-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.