IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v56y2000i1p17-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Too Many Cooks Spoil the Profits: Investment Club Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Brad M. Barber
  • Terrance Odean

Abstract

We report our analysis, using account data from a large discount brokerage firm, of the common stock investment performance of 166 investment clubs from February 1991 through January 1997. The average club tilted its common stock investment toward high-beta, small-cap growth stocks and turned over 65 percent of its portfolio annually. The average club lagged the performance of a broad-based market index and the performance of individual investors. Moreover, 60 percent of the clubs underperformed the index. The financial press has made frequent and bold claims about the performance of investment clubs. One often-quoted figure from a National Association of Investors Corporation survey states that 60 percent of investment clubs beat the market. Are these claims myth or reality?We used account data from a large discount broker to analyze the common stock investment performance of 166 investment clubs from February 1991 to January 1997. We report that the average club earned an annualized geometric mean return of 14.1 percent whereas a market index returned 17.9 percent. In addition, 60 percent of the clubs we analyzed underperformed the index. Not only did the average club fail to beat the market, it failed to match the performance of the average individual investor, who earned 16.4 percent during our sample period.Two reasons account for the poor performance of investment clubs relative to individual investors—trading costs and investment style. Despite having roughly similar account sizes, the clubs executed smaller trades and held more stocks than did individuals. Thus, their proportionate cost of trading was higher. Trading costs accounted for approximately one-third of the clubs' performance shortfall relative to individuals. The remaining two-thirds of the shortfall was accounted for by investment style. Relative to individuals, the clubs tilted more toward large-cap stocks and growth stocks. During our sample period, large-cap stocks underperformed small-cap stocks by 15 basis points a month and growth stocks underperformed value stocks by 20 basis points a month.Investment clubs serve many useful functions: They encourage savings; they educate their members about financial matters; they foster friendships and social ties; and they entertain. Unfortunately, their investments do not beat the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Brad M. Barber & Terrance Odean, 2000. "Too Many Cooks Spoil the Profits: Investment Club Performance," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1), pages 17-25, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:56:y:2000:i:1:p:17-25
    DOI: 10.2469/faj.v56.n1.2326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2469/faj.v56.n1.2326
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2469/faj.v56.n1.2326?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:56:y:2000:i:1:p:17-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.