IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v54y1998i1p49-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market Reactions to Messages from Brokerage Ratings Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Michael J. Ho
  • Robert S. Harris

Abstract

One dimension of the strategies investment houses use to present investment advice is the number of categories in their rating systems. We studied three-, four-, and five-level systems and found that in all rating systems, upgrades outnumber downgrades. Price reactions are more pronounced to multiple-level than to single-level recommendation changes and to recommendation upgrades to the highest rating category. These price reactions confirm that the market gleans new information from analysts' research but suggest that investors, at least partially, recognize analysts' tendency toward optimism and thus react more strongly to downgrades. The price effects also show that adding more rating categories is not simply a way to portion out information in smaller bits. Some of the largest price reactions are to changes between the top two categories in a five-level system, even though the descriptions of the categories would not signal a portfolio action. Our results are consistent with the view that firms try to avoid issuing harshly worded recommendations, which might compromise revenue generation. A system with more rating categories provides for less-direct statements of bad news.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael J. Ho & Robert S. Harris, 1998. "Market Reactions to Messages from Brokerage Ratings Systems," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 49-57, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:54:y:1998:i:1:p:49-57
    DOI: 10.2469/faj.v54.n1.2144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2469/faj.v54.n1.2144
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2469/faj.v54.n1.2144?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:54:y:1998:i:1:p:49-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.