IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v53y1997i3p81-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparisons and Combinations of Long and Long/Short Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • John S. Brush

Abstract

Market-neutral long/short strategies get their returns from alphas and short rebates; long strategies get their returns from alpha and the market. Differing return and risk sources complicate their comparison, partly because of the strong market-referenced focus of conventional performance analysis. Compelling theoretical advantages of active return per unit of active risk suggest that long/short strategies are better able to deliver excess return than are conventional institutional long strategies. Long/short strategies, even with tiny positive alphas, are seen to improve investors' efficient frontiers when added to a traditional T-bill/long portfolio mix, mostly because their risk sources are uncorrelated. Surprisingly, the improvement occurs even if long/short strategies are Sharpe-ratio inferior to long strategies. These results provide theoretical support for including long/short strategies in most investors' mix of assets.

Suggested Citation

  • John S. Brush, 1997. "Comparisons and Combinations of Long and Long/Short Strategies," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(3), pages 81-89, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:53:y:1997:i:3:p:81-89
    DOI: 10.2469/faj.v53.n3.2087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2469/faj.v53.n3.2087
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2469/faj.v53.n3.2087?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:53:y:1997:i:3:p:81-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.