IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uaajxx/v28y2024i4p861-881.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing Constant Serial Dynamics in Two-Step Risk Inference for Longitudinal Actuarial Data

Author

Listed:
  • Tsz Chai Fung
  • Yinhuan Li
  • Liang Peng
  • Linyi Qian

Abstract

Forecasting Value at Risk (VaR) in non-life insurance is done by a two-step inference procedure: logistic regression for the number of claims and quantile regression for the total loss. To apply this method to longitudinal actuarial data, it is necessary to specify serial dynamics, where a constant dynamic is the simplest structure. This article diagnoses the constant serial dynamics in applying a two-step inference to each year’s actuarial data. When we do not reject this null hypothesis, we may employ panel quantile regression to improve the VaR risk forecast. The proposed test uses a two-step inference to forecast risk, constructs a test statistic by these risk forecasts, and calculates the p-value by the random weighted bootstrap method. Two simulations are performed to empirically justify the finite-sample performances. The proposed test is also applied to four datasets, revealing varying serial dynamic behaviors across different datasets and different parts of the claim distributions.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsz Chai Fung & Yinhuan Li & Liang Peng & Linyi Qian, 2024. "Testing Constant Serial Dynamics in Two-Step Risk Inference for Longitudinal Actuarial Data," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 861-881, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:28:y:2024:i:4:p:861-881
    DOI: 10.1080/10920277.2023.2292711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10920277.2023.2292711
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10920277.2023.2292711?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:28:y:2024:i:4:p:861-881. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uaaj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.