IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uaajxx/v26y2022i4p610-625.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling General Practitioners’ Total Drug Costs through GAMLSS and Collective Risk Models

Author

Listed:
  • G. P. Clemente
  • N. Savelli
  • G. A. Spedicato
  • D. Zappa

Abstract

Monitoring general practitioner prescribing costs is an important topic in order to efficiently allocate National Health Insurance resources. Using generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape with random effects, we investigate how second-order variables, related to patients, contribute to estimating the frequency, severity, and hence the total amount of costs. The total cost of prescriptions associated with a general practitioner is then derived following a collective risk theory approach by aggregating cumulants of patient cost distributions. By means of the fourth-order Cornish-Fisher expansion series of quantiles of the aggregate cost distribution of general practitioners, we construct a confidence interval for each doctor, which is used to select a subset of doctors that should be monitored to identify potential inefficiencies. A case study is developed by using structured data regarding the number and cost of prescriptions of about 900,000 patients linked to corresponding general practitioners. The prescription costs considered are only those paid fully by the national health coverage.

Suggested Citation

  • G. P. Clemente & N. Savelli & G. A. Spedicato & D. Zappa, 2022. "Modeling General Practitioners’ Total Drug Costs through GAMLSS and Collective Risk Models," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 610-625, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:26:y:2022:i:4:p:610-625
    DOI: 10.1080/10920277.2022.2026229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10920277.2022.2026229
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10920277.2022.2026229?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qianhong Lu & Xiaoqing Gan & Zhensheng Chen, 2023. "The Impact of Medical Insurance Payment Policy Reform on Medical Cost and Medical Burden in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:26:y:2022:i:4:p:610-625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uaaj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.