Author
Listed:
- Stefan Cutajar
- Helena Smigoc
- Adrian O’Hagan
Abstract
The manner in which a group of insurance risks are interrelated is commonly presented via a correlation matrix. Actuarial risk correlation matrices are often constructed using output from disparate modeling sources and can be subjectively adjusted, for example, increasing the estimated correlation between two risk sources to confer reserving prudence. Hence, while individual elements still obey the assumptions of correlation values, the overall matrix is often not mathematically valid (not positive semidefinite). This can prove problematic in using the matrix in statistical models. The first objective of this article is to review existing techniques that address the nearest positive semidefinite matrix problem in a very general setting. The chief approaches studied are Semidefinite Programming (SDP) and the Alternating Projections Method (APM). The second objective is to finesse the original problem specification to consider imposition of a block structure on the initial risk correlation matrix. This commonly employed technique identifies off-diagonal subsets of the matrix where values can or should be set equal to some constant. This may be due to similarity of the underlying risks and/or with the goal of increasing computational efficiency for processes involving large matrices. Implementation of further linear constraints of this nature requires adaptation of the standard SDP and APM algorithms. In addition, a new Shrinking Method is proposed to provide an alternative solution in the context of this increased complexity. “Nearness” is primarily considered in terms of two summary measures for differences between matrices: the Chebychev Norm (maximum element distance) and the Frobenius Norm (sum of squared element distances). Among the existing methods, adapted to function appropriately for actuarial risk matrices, APM is extremely efficient in producing solutions that are optimal in the Frobenius norm. An efficient algorithm that would return a positive semidefinite matrix that is optimal in Chebychev norm is currently unknown. However, APM is used to highlight the existence of matrices close to such an optimum and exploited, via the Shrinking Method, to find high-quality solutions. All methods are shown to work well both on artificial and real actuarial risk matrices provided under collaboration with Tokio Marine Kiln (TMK). Convergence speeds are calculated and compared and sample data and MATLAB code is provided. Ultimately the APM is identified as being superior in Frobenius distance and convergence speed. The Shrinking Method, building on the output of the APM algorithm, is demonstrated to provide excellent results at low computational cost for minimizing Chebychev distance.
Suggested Citation
Stefan Cutajar & Helena Smigoc & Adrian O’Hagan, 2017.
"Actuarial Risk Matrices: The Nearest Positive Semidefinite Matrix Problem,"
North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 552-564, October.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:21:y:2017:i:4:p:552-564
DOI: 10.1080/10920277.2017.1317273
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Vainora, J., 2024.
"Asymptotic Theory Under Network Stationarity,"
Cambridge Working Papers in Economics
2439, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
- Xavier Milhaud & Victorien Poncelet & Clement Saillard, 2018.
"Operational Choices for Risk Aggregation in Insurance: PSDization and SCR Sensitivity,"
Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-23, April.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:21:y:2017:i:4:p:552-564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uaaj .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.