IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tstfxx/v8y2024i4p262-273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A confounding bridge approach for double negative control inference on causal effects

Author

Listed:
  • Wang Miao
  • Xu Shi
  • Yilin Li
  • Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen

Abstract

Unmeasured confounding is a key challenge for causal inference. In this paper, we establish a framework for unmeasured confounding adjustment with negative control variables. A negative control outcome is associated with the confounder but not causally affected by the exposure in view, and a negative control exposure is correlated with the primary exposure or the confounder but does not causally affect the outcome of interest. We introduce an outcome confounding bridge function that depicts the relationship between the confounding effects on the primary outcome and the negative control outcome, and we incorporate a negative control exposure to identify the bridge function and the average causal effect. We also consider the extension to the positive control setting by allowing for the nonzero causal effect of the primary exposure on the control outcome. We illustrate our approach with simulations and apply it to a study about the short-term effect of air pollution on mortality. Although a standard analysis shows a significant acute effect of PM2.5 on mortality, our analysis indicates that this effect may be confounded, and after double negative control adjustment, the effect is attenuated toward zero.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang Miao & Xu Shi & Yilin Li & Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen, 2024. "A confounding bridge approach for double negative control inference on causal effects," Statistical Theory and Related Fields, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(4), pages 262-273, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tstfxx:v:8:y:2024:i:4:p:262-273
    DOI: 10.1080/24754269.2024.2390748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24754269.2024.2390748
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24754269.2024.2390748?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tstfxx:v:8:y:2024:i:4:p:262-273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tstf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.