IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transr/v29y2009i5p657-663.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Important Stated Preference Experimental Design Issues in Recent Transportation Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Bradley

Abstract

The paper discusses how the experimental design methods discussed in the preceding chapters, along with other methodological advances, can be used to address areas where SP techniques most need to be improved to deal with particular transportation contexts that are most prevalent in policy applications. Portfolio designs may be useful when people may make a series of choices in a repeating context, such as the mode used to go to work on different days of the week. The paper encourages the use of split sample approaches, where a certain experimental design variation is used for one randomly selected subsample, and one or more other design approaches are tested for other subsamples, allowing the effect of the experimental design on the responses to be tested. This approach can be used for different instructions about how respondents should think about the options, such as in the ‘cheap talk’ method to avoid non‐commitment bias. The split sample approach has also been used to compare different experimental design approaches, such as d‐optimal designs versus blocked orthogonal designs. Also encouraged are the use of experimental designs that accommodate more complete model specifications, such as error distributions around parameters, or interaction terms between choice attributes.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Bradley, 2009. "Important Stated Preference Experimental Design Issues in Recent Transportation Applications," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(5), pages 657-663, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:transr:v:29:y:2009:i:5:p:657-663
    DOI: 10.1080/01441640902867702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01441640902867702
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01441640902867702?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paha, Johannes & Rompf, Dirk & Warnecke, Christiane, 2013. "Customer choice patterns in passenger rail competition," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 209-227.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transr:v:29:y:2009:i:5:p:657-663. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TTRV20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.