IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transr/v29y2009i5p557-567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dealing with Increased Complexity in Conjoint Experiments: Background and Overview of Alternate Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Harry J.P. Timmermans
  • Eric J.E. Molin

Abstract

This paper serves as background information for the TRB workshop on stated preference modelling. The main argument of the paper is that the development of stated preference and choice models has witnessed increased complexity, which in turn has led to higher respondent burden. The paper discusses some examples of such increased complexity and some potential solutions to reduce respondent burden. Because some of these developments and solutions are discussed in more detail in other workshop papers, the level of detail in this paper depends on the specific topic. Those topics that are not discussed in the workshops receive slightly more attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Harry J.P. Timmermans & Eric J.E. Molin, 2009. "Dealing with Increased Complexity in Conjoint Experiments: Background and Overview of Alternate Approaches," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(5), pages 557-567, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:transr:v:29:y:2009:i:5:p:557-567
    DOI: 10.1080/01441640902827532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01441640902827532
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01441640902827532?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marije Schaafsma & Roy Brouwer, 2020. "Substitution Effects in Spatial Discrete Choice Experiments," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 75(2), pages 323-349, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transr:v:29:y:2009:i:5:p:557-567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TTRV20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.