IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transp/v38y2015i1p111-130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making meaningful comparisons between road and rail - substituting average energy consumption data for rail with empirical analysis

Author

Listed:
  • James Pritchard
  • John Preston
  • John Armstrong

Abstract

Within the transport sector, modal shift towards more efficient and less polluting modes could be a key policy goal to help meet targets to reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions. However, making comparisons between modes is not necessarily straightforward. Average energy and emissions data are often relied upon, particularly for, rail, which may not be applicable to a given context. Some UK train operating companies have recently fitted electricity metres to their trains, from which energy consumption data have been obtained. This has enabled an understanding to be gained of how energy consumption and related emissions are affected by a number of factors, including train and service type. Comparisons are made with existing data for road and rail. It is noted that although more specific data can be useful in informing policy and making some decisions, average data continue to play an important role when considering the overall picture.

Suggested Citation

  • James Pritchard & John Preston & John Armstrong, 2015. "Making meaningful comparisons between road and rail - substituting average energy consumption data for rail with empirical analysis," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 111-130, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:38:y:2015:i:1:p:111-130
    DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2014.976985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03081060.2014.976985
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03081060.2014.976985?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:38:y:2015:i:1:p:111-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GTPT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.