IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v62y2024i23p8462-8484.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To allow or not to allow tipping: tipping strategy choice for service platforms under competition

Author

Listed:
  • Wenqian Zhang
  • Haiyan Wang

Abstract

To provide consumers with a channel to interact directly with service retailers, some service platforms have allowed consumers to incentivize service retailers for better service via tipping. There are pros and cons of allowing and not allowing tipping in terms of service levels and costs, which can affect consumer utility and platform profitability. By developing a game-theoretic model, we analyze the tipping strategy choices of platforms under competition. We find that when the service ability of service retailers is high, platforms with service retailer pricing should allow tipping, whereas for at least one platform with platform pricing, they should allow it only when the commission rate is also high. Interestingly, if consumers are concerned about service levels in addition to service prices during tipping, for platforms with platform pricing, only one platform should allow tipping when the service ability is medium. However, when the service ability is low or when the sensitiveness of the service level to tips exceeds the threshold, neither platform should allow tipping, regardless of pricing models. Finally, an all-win outcome for service platforms, service retailers, and consumers may be achieved only when platforms adopt different pricing models.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenqian Zhang & Haiyan Wang, 2024. "To allow or not to allow tipping: tipping strategy choice for service platforms under competition," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(23), pages 8462-8484, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:62:y:2024:i:23:p:8462-8484
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2024.2342578
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2024.2342578
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2024.2342578?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:62:y:2024:i:23:p:8462-8484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.