IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v62y2024i19p7279-7299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the shortcomings in formal criteria selection for multicriteria decision making based inventory classification models: a systematic review and future directions

Author

Listed:
  • Frank Michael Theunissen
  • Carel Nicolaas Bezuidenhout
  • Shafiq Alam

Abstract

Criteria selection significantly impacts the reliability and utility of multicriteria decision making (MCDM) models. While criteria may vary across industries, a formalised criteria selection process is influential in determining MCDM model outcomes. This article analyses and compares the criteria selection approaches used in 62 articles that apply MCDM-based inventory classification models, contrasting them with methodologies outside the field. Our findings reveal a conspicuous absence of formal criteria selection methods within MCDM-based inventory classification research. The limited application of quantitative and qualitative approaches indicates that this field has not kept pace with methodological advances in criteria selection. To bridge this gap, we advocate for further research aimed at developing a conceptual framework for criteria selection tailored to inventory classification. We also suggest evaluating the impact of formal criteria selection processes on inventory management decisions and exploring the benefits of integrating artificial intelligence into criteria selection for inventory classification studies. Additionally, this article identifies several limitations related to criteria selection for practitioners employing MCDM-based inventory classification models.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank Michael Theunissen & Carel Nicolaas Bezuidenhout & Shafiq Alam, 2024. "Exploring the shortcomings in formal criteria selection for multicriteria decision making based inventory classification models: a systematic review and future directions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(19), pages 7279-7299, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:62:y:2024:i:19:p:7279-7299
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2024.2320680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2024.2320680
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2024.2320680?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:62:y:2024:i:19:p:7279-7299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.