Author
Listed:
- Kuen-Suan Chen
- Yuan-Lung Lai
- Ming-Chieh Huang
- Tsang-Chuan Chang
Abstract
Maintaining high levels of process quality is crucial to the competitiveness of manufacturing firms in today's increasingly global marketplace. To ensure the quality of manufactured products meets customer needs, process capability indices (PCIs) are widely used to analyze the process performance of various processing characteristics. Products characterise by processing characteristics of both unilateral and bilateral specifications are common in the current sales market. Manufacturing firms must often adopt multiple PCIs to analyze the process performance of a single product, which is inefficient in practical applications and management. Yield-based index $ {C_{pk}} $ Cpk is not subject to this limitation. For this reason, we employed $ {C_{pk}} $ Cpk to evaluate process performance and the effectiveness of improvement measures. In practice, $ {C_{pk}} $ Cpk is estimated from samples, which means that misjudgment may occur in the assessment of process performance and improvement effectiveness due to sampling errors. We therefore derived the $ 100({1 - \alpha } )\% $ 100(1−α)% confidence interval of $ {C_{pk}} $ Cpk and, based on the producer's perspective, used the upper confidence limit to evaluate improvement effectiveness. To lower the risk of misjudgment and increase the reliability of improvement effectiveness in the case of data uncertainty, this paper further proposes fuzzy estimation using the right-sided confidence interval of $ {C_{pk}} $ Cpk and develops the fuzzy judgement model.
Suggested Citation
Kuen-Suan Chen & Yuan-Lung Lai & Ming-Chieh Huang & Tsang-Chuan Chang, 2023.
"Fuzzy judgement model for assessment of improvement effectiveness to performance of processing characteristics,"
International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(5), pages 1591-1605, March.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:61:y:2023:i:5:p:1591-1605
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2022.2044531
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:61:y:2023:i:5:p:1591-1605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.