IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v61y2023i22p7866-7902.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the transition from techno centric industry 4.0 towards value centric industry 5.0: a systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Etieno Enang
  • Mahdi Bashiri
  • David Jarvis

Abstract

This systematic literature review synthesises the literature on human centric IN 4.0 and IN 5.0 while exploring driving forces behind the transition from technocentric IN 4.0 to value centric IN 5.0 using the principles of the multiple level perspective (MLP). Works that discuss contextual, regime and niche level factors which impact on the transition were explored. The Covid- 19 pandemic and Climate change are identified as key contextual, ‘Landscape’, factors impacting the transition while Trust, Mass personalisation and Autonomy are highlighted as key Regime factors. In terms of Niche innovations, Advanced Extended reality technologies, Cobots/ Advanced Robotics, and Advanced AI are often connected with landscape or regime issues. Drawing on MLP theory, the study demonstrates that the transition from IN 4.0 towards IN 5.0 is occurring through a reconfiguration pattern. The paper further emphasises aspects that both practitioners and academics need to be cognisant of in order to affect a transition from IN 4.0 to IN 5.0.

Suggested Citation

  • Etieno Enang & Mahdi Bashiri & David Jarvis, 2023. "Exploring the transition from techno centric industry 4.0 towards value centric industry 5.0: a systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(22), pages 7866-7902, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:61:y:2023:i:22:p:7866-7902
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2023.2221344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2023.2221344
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2023.2221344?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mario Passalacqua & Robert Pellerin & Florian Magnani & Philippe Doyon-Poulin & Laurène Del-Aguila & Jared Boasen & Pierre-Majorique Léger, 2024. "Human-centred AI in industry 5.0: a systematic review," Post-Print hal-04723054, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:61:y:2023:i:22:p:7866-7902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.