IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v61y2023i20p6891-6907.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic allocation of human resources: case study in the metal 4.0 manufacturing industry

Author

Listed:
  • Maude Beauchemin
  • Marc-André Ménard
  • Jonathan Gaudreault
  • Nadia Lehoux
  • Stéphane Agnard
  • Claude-Guy Quimper

Abstract

Industry 4.0 concepts make it possible to rethink human resources allocation, even for more traditional environments like metal machining. While parts machining on Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machines is automated, some manual tasks must still be executed by operators. The current approach is typically that operators are statically allocated to one or many machines. This causes avoidable bottlenecks. We propose an optimisation model to dynamically assign tasks to the operators with the objective of minimising production delays. Three different scenarios are compared; one representing the current widely used static allocation method and two others that allow more flexibility in the operators’ allocation. The dynamic task assignment problem is solved using a constraint programming model. The model was applied to a case study from a high-precision metal manufacturing job shop. Experimental results show that switching from a static allocation to a dynamic one reduces by 76% the average production delays caused by human operators. Supposing more versatile operators under the dynamic allocation leads to further improvements.

Suggested Citation

  • Maude Beauchemin & Marc-André Ménard & Jonathan Gaudreault & Nadia Lehoux & Stéphane Agnard & Claude-Guy Quimper, 2023. "Dynamic allocation of human resources: case study in the metal 4.0 manufacturing industry," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(20), pages 6891-6907, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:61:y:2023:i:20:p:6891-6907
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2022.2139002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2022.2139002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2022.2139002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:61:y:2023:i:20:p:6891-6907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.