IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v60y2022i7p2126-2150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysing the effectiveness of workload balancing measures in order picking operations

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Vanheusden
  • Teun van Gils
  • Kris Braekers
  • Katrien Ramaekers
  • An Caris

Abstract

An intensified competition forces warehouses to handle more orders in shorter time windows. This complicates the timely retrieval of these customer orders. Planning order picking operations, thereby aiming to increase efficiency, inevitably results in balancing concerns, such as imbalances among pick areas, pickers or time periods. Reducing workload imbalances, therefore anticipating on workload peaks, results in a more stable order picking process. However, there exist several measures that can be used to evaluate and correct existing imbalances. This study contributes to academic literature by analysing, explaining and evaluating the effectiveness of various workload balancing approaches (e.g. Rawlsian's approach, range, mean-based) in order picking operations, more specifically in the context of balancing workload over time in case of restricted time windows for retrieving customer orders. Results show that the effect of warehouse layout characteristics and customer order parameters on the effectiveness of balancing measures is very limited. However, the underlying managerial reason (e.g. workforce allocation, transportation schedule or human well-being) for solving the operational workload balancing problem does significantly impact the effectiveness and choice of an appropriate balancing measure.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Vanheusden & Teun van Gils & Kris Braekers & Katrien Ramaekers & An Caris, 2022. "Analysing the effectiveness of workload balancing measures in order picking operations," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(7), pages 2126-2150, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:60:y:2022:i:7:p:2126-2150
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2021.1884307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2021.1884307
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2021.1884307?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:60:y:2022:i:7:p:2126-2150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.