IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v60y2022i23p7113-7135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inequality aversion in cooperative advertising in supply chain: an experimental study

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Li
  • Xiaobo Zhao
  • Jinxing Xie
  • Wanshan Zhu

Abstract

In this study, we experimentally investigate the decisions of a manufacturer and a retailer in cooperative advertising. Specifically, in the first stage, the manufacturer proposes the percentage he will reimburse on the advertising expenditure, and then the retailer decides the advertising expenditure in the second stage. In the controlled laboratory experiments, we find that the manufacturer's and the retailer's decisions systematically deviate from the equilibrium prediction and exhibit inequality aversion on both cost and profit. The manufacturer tends to share half of the advertising cost and also decreases the participation rate when his profit is less than the retailer, whereas the retailer decreases the advertising expenditure to reduce the gap on cost and profit between the two parties. We further develop behavioural models and show that the manufacturer's inequality aversion on cost can be a positive force, because it increases the supply chain profit when the profit margin ratio is relatively low between the manufacturer and the retailer.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Li & Xiaobo Zhao & Jinxing Xie & Wanshan Zhu, 2022. "Inequality aversion in cooperative advertising in supply chain: an experimental study," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(23), pages 7113-7135, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:60:y:2022:i:23:p:7113-7135
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2021.2004465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2021.2004465
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2021.2004465?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:60:y:2022:i:23:p:7113-7135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.