IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v60y2022i22p6750-6771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitive bi-agent flowshop scheduling to minimise the weighted combination of makespans

Author

Listed:
  • Danyu Bai
  • Ali Diabat
  • Xinyue Wang
  • Dandan Yang
  • Yao Fu
  • Zhi-Hai Zhang
  • Chin-Chia Wu

Abstract

Customer satisfaction is a prevalent issue amongst manufacturing enterprises. Multi-agent scheduling models aim to optimise the given criteria for improving customer satisfaction by fulfilling the customisation requirements. An investigation is executed on a bi-agent flowshop scheduling model, where a mass of tasks maintained by two competitive agents share a group of successive processors over time. The objective is to determine a feasible schedule that minimises the weighted combination of makespans belonging to two different agents. Asymptotic and worst-case analyses are conducted on a class of dominant-agent-based heuristics proposed to find approximate solutions for large-scale instances. An effective branch and bound algorithm is presented to achieve optimal solutions for small-scale instances, where the release-date-based branching rules and the preemption-based lower bounds significantly speed up the convergence of the proposed algorithm. A discrete artificial bee colony algorithm is introduced to find high-quality solutions for medium-scale instances. Extensive computational experiments are conducted to reveal the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Danyu Bai & Ali Diabat & Xinyue Wang & Dandan Yang & Yao Fu & Zhi-Hai Zhang & Chin-Chia Wu, 2022. "Competitive bi-agent flowshop scheduling to minimise the weighted combination of makespans," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(22), pages 6750-6771, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:60:y:2022:i:22:p:6750-6771
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2021.1923854
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2021.1923854
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2021.1923854?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:60:y:2022:i:22:p:6750-6771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.