IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v60y2022i19p5977-5993.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Appointment window scheduling with wait-dependent abandonment for elective inpatient admission

Author

Listed:
  • Yuwei Lu
  • Zhibin Jiang
  • Na Geng
  • Shan Jiang
  • Xiaolan Xie

Abstract

In this study, we propose a new appointment window scheduling (AWS) approach of informing customers of an admission window (AW) rather than the traditional appointment time. We provide a formal description of this AWS problem for only one kind of customer and propose a dedicated chance-constrained policy to assign AWs dynamically under the condition with fixed service capacity, different scales as well as status in different waiting stages, and wait-dependent abandonment. Numerical experiments show that customer satisfaction can be significantly improved (by reducing over 60% of wait-but-abandon events and by reducing 90% of departures caused by waiting beyond the AW), and server utilisation is slightly improved. And the improvements are more significant when systems are overloaded, and customers are more sensitive to online waiting than offline waiting. The AWS scenario can also be applied to other queueing systems as long as it is possible and profitable to let customers wait outside of the waiting area.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuwei Lu & Zhibin Jiang & Na Geng & Shan Jiang & Xiaolan Xie, 2022. "Appointment window scheduling with wait-dependent abandonment for elective inpatient admission," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(19), pages 5977-5993, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:60:y:2022:i:19:p:5977-5993
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2021.1977407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2021.1977407
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2021.1977407?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:60:y:2022:i:19:p:5977-5993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.