IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v59y2021i3p909-925.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of emission permit allocation in an early-stage cap-and-trade for a duopoly market

Author

Listed:
  • Yanfang Zheng
  • Wenhui Zhou
  • Xi Chen
  • Weixiang Huang

Abstract

Cap-and-trade systems, or emission trading systems (ETS), are increasingly adopted by countries and regions to provide economic incentives for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The majority of existing ETS are early-stage systems implemented in and after 2013. These early-stage ETS are typically characterised by a focus on few industry sectors, and the employment of free emission allocation schemes including grandfathering and benchmarking. In this paper, we investigate the impact of emission allocation schemes in an early-stage cap-and-trade system in a duopoly market. We show that benchmarking scheme may lead the energy-efficient firm to reserve part of its emission permits, while firms always use up their after-trading permits under grandfathering. We also find that a more stringent emission cap may increase firms' profits rather than decreasing them under both allocation schemes, suggesting a possible cause for windfall profits observed in early-stage ETS. Benchmarking is found to lead to lower emissions compared to those under grandfathering, while it may result in higher or lower firm profits, consumer surplus, and the overall social welfare. Furthermore, under either allocation scheme, allowing emission trading does not affect the total emissions, while it can increase firm profits and consumer surplus and therefore the overall social welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanfang Zheng & Wenhui Zhou & Xi Chen & Weixiang Huang, 2021. "The effect of emission permit allocation in an early-stage cap-and-trade for a duopoly market," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(3), pages 909-925, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:59:y:2021:i:3:p:909-925
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1711986
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2020.1711986
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2020.1711986?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Naiqi Liu & Wansheng Tang & Yanfei Lan & Huili Pei, 2024. "Pricing and carbon reduction decisions for a new uncertain dual-channel supply chain under cap-and-trade regulation," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 415-448, September.
    2. Feng, Huchen & Hu, Yu-Jie & Li, Chengjiang & Wang, Honglei, 2023. "Rolling horizon optimisation strategy and initial carbon allowance allocation model to reduce carbon emissions in the power industry: Case of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    3. Fang Dong & Chengdong Shi & Weitong Yu, 2022. "Coordinated Decision-Making in Embedded Supply Chain from a Sustainable Development Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Huang, Shangjiu & Lu, Hao & Chen, Maozhi & Zhao, Wenjun, 2023. "Integrated energy system scheduling considering the correlation of uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    5. Guanxuan Su & Benhe Gao, 2024. "The Effect of Carbon Quota Policy on Environmental Sustainability of Power Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Zheng, Xiao-Xue & Zhang, Shiyuan & Jia, Fu & Lin, Xiao, 2024. "A new biform game-based coordination mechanism for a carbon complementary supply chain under hybrid carbon regulations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    7. Zhang, Xuefeng & Li, Zhe & Li, Guo, 2024. "Grandfather-based or benchmark-based: Strategy choice for carbon quota allocation methods in the carbon neutrality era," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    8. Fu, Ke & Li, Yanzhi & Mao, Huiqiang & Miao, Zhaowei, 2023. "Firms’ production and green technology strategies: The role of emission asymmetry and carbon taxes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1100-1112.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:59:y:2021:i:3:p:909-925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.