IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v59y2021i21p6361-6381.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Possibilistic Pareto-dominance approach to support technical bid selection under imprecision and uncertainty in engineer-to-order bidding process

Author

Listed:
  • Abdourahim Sylla
  • Thierry Coudert
  • Elise Vareilles
  • Laurent Geneste
  • Michel Aldanondo

Abstract

Successful bidding involves defining relevant technical bid solutions that conform to the customers' requirements, then selecting the most interesting one for the commercial offer. However, in Engineer-To-Order (ETO) industrial contexts, this selection process is complicated by issues of imprecision, uncertainty and confidence regarding the values of the decision criteria. To address this complexity, a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) support approach is proposed in this study. This approach is based on possibility theory and the Pareto-dominance principle. It involves three main stages. First, a method is proposed to automatically model the values of the decision criteria by possibility distributions. Second, four possibilistic mono-criterion dominance relations are developed to compare two solutions with respect to a single decision criterion. Finally, an interactive method is devised to determine the most interesting technical bid solutions with respect to all the decision criteria. The method is applied to the design of a technical bid solution of a crane. The results show that this approach enables bidders to select the most interesting solution during a bidding process, while taking into account imprecision, uncertainty and their own confidence regarding the values of the decision criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdourahim Sylla & Thierry Coudert & Elise Vareilles & Laurent Geneste & Michel Aldanondo, 2021. "Possibilistic Pareto-dominance approach to support technical bid selection under imprecision and uncertainty in engineer-to-order bidding process," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(21), pages 6361-6381, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:59:y:2021:i:21:p:6361-6381
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1812754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2020.1812754
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2020.1812754?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:59:y:2021:i:21:p:6361-6381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.