IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v59y2021i18p5495-5524.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selection of best buyback strategy for original equipment manufacturer and independent remanufacturer – game theoretic approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ankita Ray
  • Arijit De
  • Sandeep Mondal
  • Junwei Wang

Abstract

The study considers two supply chain members, an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) producing new and remanufactured products and an independent remanufacturer (IR) collecting used products of OEM and producing remanufactured products. Furthermore, OEM and IR are involved in competition to collect the used products by providing various exciting offers to the customers. A two period analytical model is developed to investigate the profitable buyback strategy for OEM and IR under low and high pricing strategy. In first period, OEM performs remanufacturing and considers a strategy to collect the product cores from end users under a certain pricing strategy. Under extensive game format, IR joins in the remanufacturing business to compete with OEM and based on OEM's attractive buyback strategy, IR adopts a profitable pricing strategy. The research addresses oligopoly market where OEM is not the single seller of new product and other sellers are interested in remanufacturing. In such scenario, OEM has less control over used products collection of other brand and OEM cannot restrict independent remanufacturer to venture within remanufacturing business. The findings of the study depicted that low pricing strategy “exchange offer” is profitable buyback decision for OEM and “incentive offer” is profitable buyback decision for independent remanufacturer.

Suggested Citation

  • Ankita Ray & Arijit De & Sandeep Mondal & Junwei Wang, 2021. "Selection of best buyback strategy for original equipment manufacturer and independent remanufacturer – game theoretic approach," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(18), pages 5495-5524, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:59:y:2021:i:18:p:5495-5524
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1784486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2020.1784486
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2020.1784486?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Guangxia & Gong, Yeming & Hong, Xianpei, 2022. "Free rider effect of quality information disclosure in remanufacturing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    2. Wojciech Rabiega & Artur Gorzałczyński & Robert Jeszke & Paweł Mzyk & Krystian Szczepański, 2021. "How Long Will Combustion Vehicles Be Used? Polish Transport Sector on the Pathway to Climate Neutrality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Shubham Kumar Singh & Anand Chauhan & Biswajit Sarkar, 2022. "Supply Chain Management of E-Waste for End-of-Life Electronic Products with Reverse Logistics," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Mao, Huiying & Wang, Wenbin & Liu, Conghu & Xu, Yi & Zhao, Shuiying, 2023. "Effects of the carbon emission quota policy on the quality and sales of manufactured and remanufactured products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    5. Yanfei Xia & Quan Guo & Hao Sun & Ke Li & Zongyu Mu, 2022. "Green R&D Financing Strategy in Platform Supply Chain with Data-Driven Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Shushu Xie & Yingxue Zhao & Lin Zhao & Xingyuan He, 2024. "Do Online Reviews Always Incentivise Remanufacturers to Improve Quality in a Competitive Environment?," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(67), pages 903-903, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:59:y:2021:i:18:p:5495-5524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.