IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v59y2021i11p3378-3397.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating barriers and solutions for social sustainability adoption in multi-tier supply chains

Author

Listed:
  • Syed Abdul Rehman Khan
  • Karim Zkik
  • Amine Belhadi
  • Sachin S. Kamble

Abstract

Multi-tier sustainable supply chain management (MT-SSCM) is increasingly attracting a great deal of interest in academia and practice. However, attention to social sustainability has been relatively limited, and the initiatives of implementing social sustainability, especially in low-tier suppliers in supply chains, are facing enormous barriers and obstacles. The central aim of this paper is to investigate the obstacles that hinder the adoption of social sustainability in the multi-tier supply chain (MT-SC) and prioritise the most effective solutions to promote the adoption of this critical concept. Therefore, we based an extensive literature review on identifying the most relevant barriers and solutions to social sustainability adoption in MT-SC. Moreover, we propose a hybrid and multi-context methodology based on hesitant fuzzy sets (HFS), cumulative prospect theory (CPT) along with VIKOR to identify the most prominent barriers and solutions for three supply-chain sectors, i.e. chemical, agri-food, and textile. The results indicate that solutions to social sustainability in MT-SC are sensitive to the supply chain sector. However, there is a general trend toward adopting emerging technologies and openness and transparency-based relationships with the external environment. Managers could use these results to redirect their strategies to promote social sustainability, particularly in low-tier suppliers in under-developed countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Karim Zkik & Amine Belhadi & Sachin S. Kamble, 2021. "Evaluating barriers and solutions for social sustainability adoption in multi-tier supply chains," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(11), pages 3378-3397, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:59:y:2021:i:11:p:3378-3397
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2021.1876271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2021.1876271
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2021.1876271?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nadia Yusuf & Miltiadis D. Lytras, 2023. "Competitive Sustainability of Saudi Companies through Digitalization and the Circular Carbon Economy Model: A Bold Contribution to the Vision 2030 Agenda in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Kansilembo Aliamutu & Msizi Mkhize, 2024. "Supply Chain Limitations in the South African Engineering Sector-Supply Chain Professionals Views," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 16(1), pages 305-313.
    3. Yuan, Baolong & Cao, Xueyun, 2022. "Do corporate social responsibility practices contribute to green innovation? The mediating role of green dynamic capability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Jamalnia, Aboozar & Gong, Yu & Govindan, Kannan, 2023. "Sub-supplier's sustainability management in multi-tier supply chains: A systematic literature review on the contingency variables, and a conceptual framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    5. Jakob Keller & Martin Jung & Rainer Lasch, 2022. "Sustainability Governance: Insights from a Cocoa Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-23, August.
    6. Qian Hongdao & Sughra Bibi & Dahai Mu & Asif Khan & Asad Raza, 2022. "Legal Business Model Digitalization: The Post COVID-19 Legal Industry," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    7. Jinghua Liu & Muhammad Umer Quddoos & Muhammad Hanif Akhtar & Muhammad Sajid Amin & Muhammad Tariq & Arij Lamar, 2022. "Digital technologies and circular economy in supply chain management: in the era of COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 326-341, June.
    8. Mahesh Shaw & Abhijit Majumdar & Kannan Govindan, 2022. "Barriers of social sustainability: an improved interpretive structural model of Indian textile and clothing supply chain," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1616-1633, December.
    9. Ulpan Tokkozhina & Ana Lucia Martins & Joao C. Ferreira, 2023. "Uncovering dimensions of the impact of blockchain technology in supply chain management," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 99-125, March.
    10. Farheen Naz & Rohit Agrawal & Anil Kumar & Angappa Gunasekaran & Abhijit Majumdar & Sunil Luthra, 2022. "Reviewing the applications of artificial intelligence in sustainable supply chains: Exploring research propositions for future directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2400-2423, July.
    11. Harshad Sonar & Nikhil Ghag & Yashomandira Kharde & Shriya Ghosh, 2023. "Analysis of barriers affecting circular economy adoption in food supply chain: A strategic perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5273-5288, December.
    12. Daniel J. Veit & Jason B. Thatcher, 2023. "Digitalization as a problem or solution? Charting the path for research on sustainable information systems," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(6), pages 1231-1253, August.
    13. Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Zhang Yu & Muhammad Umar & Hafiz Muhammad Zia‐ul‐haq & Muhammad Tanveer & Laeeq Razzak Janjua, 2022. "Renewable energy and advanced logistical infrastructure: Carbon‐free economic development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 693-702, August.
    14. R. Krishankumar & P. P. Amritha & K. S. Ravichandran, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: An integrated fuzzy decision model for prioritization of barriers affecting sustainability adoption within supply chains under unknown weight context," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1010-1027, December.
    15. Wen-Kuo Chen & Ching-Torng Lin, 2021. "Interrelationship among CE Adoption Obstacles of Supply Chain in the Textile Sector: Based on the DEMATEL-ISM Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-24, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:59:y:2021:i:11:p:3378-3397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.