Author
Listed:
- Liane Marcia Freitas Silva
- Ana Camila Rodrigues de Oliveira
- Maria Silene Alexandre Leite
- Fernando A. S. Marins
Abstract
The objective of this article is to present a proposed application for systematic risk assessment considering the dependence between risks. The proposal relies on a systematic literature review (SLR) as the initial phase, in which the risk classes, management phases and the tools that can be applied to the risk assessment are identified, considering the dependence between them. For this, the system adopted includes the identification and later evaluation of the risks. The evaluation involves the analytic network process (ANP), Monte Carlo Simulation and conditional probability by means of Bayes’ theorem. The identification and evaluation of the risks were applied to two links of a piped gas supply chain in Brazil, identified as company X and Y, where six specialists were interviewed in each company in the managerial areas. The ANP indicted that the most critical risk in the links is the demand risk. From this, it was possible through Monte Carlo Simulation to identify the probability of occurrence of events with connection to demand risk: demand (X) / demand risk (Y), with probability of 10%; price risk (X) / demand risk (Y), with probability of 0.64%; and risk of supply (Y) / demand risk (X), with a probability of 0%. This indicates that the highest risk is the risk of demand of firm Y, and therefore mitigation strategies should focus on this risk, as it represents the true cause of supply chain vulnerability, generating risk with the highest probability.
Suggested Citation
Liane Marcia Freitas Silva & Ana Camila Rodrigues de Oliveira & Maria Silene Alexandre Leite & Fernando A. S. Marins, 2021.
"Risk assessment model using conditional probability and simulation: case study in a piped gas supply chain in Brazil,"
International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(10), pages 2960-2976, May.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:59:y:2021:i:10:p:2960-2976
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1744764
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:59:y:2021:i:10:p:2960-2976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.